Car- Porsche Macan 3,0l, 268 HP, Built 2015, Baden near Vienna-Austria

Consumption without Fuel 
Saver: 9,26 l/100Km

Consumption with Fuel 
Saver: 7,76 l/100Km

Savings: 16,16%
 
 
 
 

The consumption comparison by Prof. Dr. Schabauer with his Porsche Macan (BJ2015) showed a diesel reduction of 8.3% in 2016! (Summer vs. winter tyres) The long-term comparison over 4.5 years brought a very pleasing saving of 16.16%!
 
Prof. Dr. Schabauer, Baden near Vienna-Austria

Scooter-Roller Yamaha Neos 100, Altusried-Germany

Consumption without Fuel 
Saver: 3,5 l/100Km

Consumption with Fuel 
Saver: 2,71 l/100Km

Savings: 22,57%
 
 
 
 
 

Hello from the summery Allgäu, just under 800km away from you. Here is the experience with my 13 year old scooter, Yamaha Neos 100:

After two tank fillings: 22.5% savings! Lightweight but noticeably better driving performance. I would not have believed that before!

Rudi Arnold, Altusried-Germany

 

Tractor-Holland T7050, 212 HP, Schermbeck-Germ

Consumption without Fuel 
Saver: 5,6 l/100Km

Consumption with Fuel 

Saver: 4,5 l/100Km

Savings: 19,64%
 
 
 
 

In Schermbeck, a New Holland tractor T7050 with 212 hp was measured on a test stand (Eggers Dynanometer PT 300SE): Measurements were taken at the power levels: 50 hp and 150 hp with the ECOPower Fuel Saver. The saving was about 20%

Hubert Schwan, Schermbeck-Germany

Car- Nissan Micra Mouse, St. Christophen-Austria

Consumption without Fuel 

Saver: 6,1 l/100Km

Consumption with Fuel 

Saver: 4,88 l/100Km

Savings: 20,00%
 
 
 



 
As a technician, I was very skeptical about this new technology and I already felt confirmed that the ECOPower Fuel Saver had no effect after driving 3 tank fillings and no savings were evident.
Most of the time I only drive short distances with the small car and so it took more than 5 tank fillings until a reduction set in. But the reduction has now turned out to be very impressive with an increase in distance performance by 100 km per tank filling from originally 380 to 480 km. Fuel consumption has decreased by around 20%, which is simply sensational from a personal point of view!
The test has been running for me for over a year now and was carried out without changing tires and with the same tire pressure. I assume that the Fuel Saver can save a lot of money with old small cars, since the dirty fuel system cleans itself again over time. It has to be mentioned that the power has noticeably improved in the lower speed range.
 
Ing. Alfons Fietz, St. Christophen-Austria

Car-Nissan NV 200 van, 90 HP, Allgäu-Germany

Consumption without Fuel 

Saver: 5,3 l/100Km

Consumption with Fuel 

Saver: 4,5 l/100Km

Savings: 15,09%

 

I installed the ECOPower Fuel Saver in my new NISSAN NV 200 station wagon. After driving about 4500 kilometers I draw the following conclusion:

In the long run, the Fuel Saver is a really worthwhile investment!

 

According to the factory specification, the consumption of the 90 hp machine is 5.3 l / 100 km & 138 g CO2 emissions. And the factory specifications can often only be observed under optimal conditions.

 

Although I drive normally, a saving of around 0.8 liters of diesel per 100 km (5.3 to 4.5) is certainly not only due to my anticipatory, defensive driving style.

 

I am very satisfied with the ECOPower Fuel Saver.

Ludwig Berger, Allgäu-Germany

Car-Subaru WRX STI

Consumption without Fuel Saver: 9,7 l/100Km

Consumption with Fuel 

Saver: 8,4 l/100Km

Savings: 13,40%
 
 
 

I would like to briefly describe my experiences with the ECOPOwer Fuel Saver, which was installed correctly from June.

After the fuel saver was positioned correctly at the bottom of the tank, fuel consumption dropped from around 9.7 liters to 8.4 liters now. Today I filled up the fourth tank since the correct assembly and used about 33 liters over about 400 kilometers. I mainly drive my Subaru only to my place of work or 1-3 trips (per tank filling) are private (shopping, visiting friends). So the values are very easy to compare for me, I'm definitely very satisfied with the current result.

 

When I drive 100 km/h on country roads, I have about 2,200 rpm in 6th gear and have to step on the gas a lot more despite the 300 hp. The maximum torque of 407 NM is only available at 4,000 rpm.

 

Since my Subaru WRX STI has a large turbo lag in the lower speed range up to approx. 2,600 rpm, it was improved a little by the Fuelsaver Type L.

 

Stefan Kutzner

 

Car-Toyota Verso, Brand-Laaben-Austria

Consumption without Fuel 

Saver: 6,44 l/100Km

Consumption with Fuel 

Saver: 5,86 l/100Km

Savings: 9,02 %
 

My regular route of 120km takes me with my Toyota Verso from 3053 Brand-Laaben to 1230 Vienna to the office, since using the ECOPower Fuel Saver my average consumption has fallen by 9.02%. I can recommend the product. I will compare and publish the amount of exhaust gas reduction at the next review according to §57 (motor vehicle law).

 

Leo Weidinger, Brand-Laaben-Austria

 

Bus-MAN Lions Coach RZH414, Vienna-Austria

Consumption without Fuel Saver: 29,25 l/100KM

Consumption with Fuel Saver: 24,95 l/100Km

Savings: 14,72%

A route test was carried out on the A2 southern autobahn from Vienna to Kottingbrunn and back over 67 km with a touring coach from MAN Lions Coach RZH414 at 100 km per hour. 

Our previous experiences were impressively confirmed, the average value of the fuel consumption decreased by 14.72%. 

The route was driven a total of 3 times, 2 times on July 21st in immediate succession, once without and once with 2 pieces of ECOPower-Fuel Saver for trucks in the tank. In a direct day-to-day comparison, the reduction was 10.5% (from 19.6 to 17.5 liters); 

A month later, on the third comparison trip under identical conditions, the saving increased to 19%. The route test gives security and is really convincing.

Dietmar Flaschberger - CEO, Wiener Lokalbahnen, Vienna-Austria

Car-Toyota Yaris Verso, 90 HP, Built 2006, Rorschacherberg-Switzerland

Consumption without Fuel 

Saver: 7,20 l/100Km

Consumption with Fuel 
Saver: 6,50 l/100Km

Savings: 9,72 %

 
 
 

My Toyota Yaris Verso, built in 2006, 1.5 liters displacement, 90 hp, had an average consumption of approx. 7.2 liters/100 km. After installing the ECOPower Fuel Saver M directly in the petrol tank, little happened at first. But after about 3-4 tank fillings the consumption dropped. It is now around 6.5 litres/100 km. The saving is about 10%. The handling has also improved. He has a much better pulling power than before. I've been driving with the Fuelsaver for 1 ½ years now and can only recommend it.

 
René Tobler, Rorschacherberg-Switzerland

Dredger-Liebherr 317, Schermbeck-Germany

Consumption without Fuel Saver:6,9 l/hr

Consumption with Fuel Saver: 5,25 l/hr

Savings: 23,91%

BWR company tested their Liebherr 317 dredger and came up with 23.9% savings. 

The load test each lasted 20 minutes with 104 even lifting movements of the loaded shovel. First without ECOPower-Fuel saver then with the Fuel Saver. 

The already economical Liebherr 317 dredger saved 23.9%.

BWR garden and landscape design, Schermbeck-Germany